首页> 外文OA文献 >Is Election a Disadvantage? Nigerian Local Councils and Security Provision
【2h】

Is Election a Disadvantage? Nigerian Local Councils and Security Provision

机译:选举是一个缺点吗?尼日利亚地方议会和安全条款

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Deepening democracy through local elections is a major aim of decentralisation. But do elections always work to strengthen the relationship between local politicians and citizens, or can they set electedofficials up for failure? This article examines security provisioning by local governments in Nigeria, understanding that some local governments are elected, while others are appointed by state governors. Our hypothesis was that elected local councils should be better rated than those thatare appointed. By looking at local government areas that differ mainly in terms of whether their council is elected or appointed, we found that local elections are not enough singly to build strong connectionsbetween democratically elected local politicians and citizens. Democratic decentralisation in the context of limited financial resources, and limited autonomy vis-à-vis state governors and political bosses, can set elected governments up for failure to the extent that they are viewed as worse performers than their appointed counterparts.
机译:通过地方选举深化民主是权力下放的主要目的。但是,选举是否总是在努力加强地方政治人物与公民之间的关系,还是可以让民选官员为失败做准备?本文研究了尼日利亚地方政府的安全配置,了解到一些地方政府是当选,而其他地方政府是由州长任命的。我们的假设是,当选的地方议会应比任命的地方议会更好。通过考察主要在选举委员会还是任命理事会方面存在差异的地方政府地区,我们发现,地方选举不足以单独建立民主选举的地方政治人物与公民之间的牢固联系。在财政资源有限,相对于州长和政治首领的自治权有限的情况下进行民主分权,可以使民选政府为失败做准备,其程度被认为是其表现不如任命的对手。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号